Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Senate Votes to Kill F22 Funding


Source: http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=4365#more-4365
Date: July 21, 2009

By Bryan McAffee

In a rather craven and partisan manner, the Senate has voted to kill funding for F22 funding in the new Defense budget:

The Senate on Tuesday voted to strip $1.75 billion on seven additional F-22 jets that President Obama said was unnecessary and would doom a $680 bill authorizing defense spending plans for the coming fiscal year.
The 58-40 vote prevents Obama from carrying out a threat to use the first veto of his presidency if senators had kept the designation in the defense bill.

…According to Lockheed Martin Corp., the main contractor, 25,000 people are directly employed in building the plane, and another 70,000 have indirect links, particularly in Georgia, Texas and California. Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., a supporter of the program, said there are 1,000 suppliers in 44 states.

Dodd, speaking on the Senate floor last week, questioned why Congress should approve $65 billion to prop up the automobile industry but can’t spend $1.75 billion to support an important segment of the aerospace industry.

The claim from Obama is that we don’t really need the F22s because they are not particularly useful in places like Iraq and Afghanistan. The fatal flaw in this kind of thinking is that who knows what the future will bring? Imagine a future war in China, without the F22s we would be totally screwed. The F16s are not going to last forever, they have already been in service for a long time. The F22s were to be the new air superiority assurance against any country that get the wrong idea. Imagine if we got in a war with Iran or any country with a real air force (Iraq had none to speak of). Having air superiority is of the utmost importance. It makes up for the fact that our ground troops don’t have to match the size of a country like Iran or China. We can hurt them really bad with minimal risk on our own part by bombing the living crap out of them. We have already spent billions of R&D and pre-production for the F22, we might as well just purchase them now while they are at their cheapest.

Read the Air Force’s response to killing the F22 funding here and here. They sure think its important.

Watch the F22 in action and tell me it’s not needed.

Get Stoked google docs:



Sunday, July 19, 2009

Bowe R. Bergdahl: Taliban Hostage Message For Obama

Source: http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=4338#more-4338
Date: July 19th, 2009

By Ignatius Reilly

Bowe R. Bergdahl is a U.S. soldier captured in southeastern Afghanistan by the Taliban. He has been missing since June 30, 2009. He is a member of 1st Battalion, 501st Parachute Infantry Regiment, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division.

Today, the Taliban released a video showing Bowe R. Bergdahl as their hostage. In the video, Bergdahl states that the date is July 14.

The Taliban has Bergdahl state on camera that there is a way for America to secure his release, and ensure that all U.S. troops are safe: To withdraw from Afghanistan. The message is almost directly addressed at Obama, who campaigned with the full support of the peace movement, and who the nation viewed as the peace candidate.

I have a question for the peace movement now. Isn’t this exactly the kind of thing that caused you to take the streets against George W. Bush? Weren’t you holding up signs that said “End This War Now”? Should those signs have included a disclaimer “Unless You Mean An Endless War in Afghanistan, Which Is Just Fine.”

At last check, the war was still going on in Afghanistan, and won’t end anytime soon. In fact, Obama has expanded this war under his administration, and stated that it will not end in his first four years. U.S. troop deaths have increased dramatically this month. The war in Iraq is still going on, with violence escalating in the past few weeks. We have withdrawn from urban areas, but this has only served to make the insurgents bolder so far, with almost daily bombings.

So……all of this is okay, so long as the President is a Democrat that you like?

Hypocrites. Either protest Obama, or admit that you have no real ideology.

Get Stoked Note: as we see the way our soldier is being abused on a battle field we are not suprised if he seems confused or disoriented. He sounds clearer to me than Pres Obama without his teleprompter.

Obama: Humanist ~ Utopian Commander in Chief

http://docs.google.com/fileview?id=F.c08ced83-30b0-47e0-8506-abd86f55322a


Group Reportedly Linked to Al Qaeda Holds First U.S. Conference


Source: http://www.khilafahconference2009.com/ Date: Sunday, July 19, 2009

FOXNews.com's Diane Macedo and FOX News' Marla Cichowski contributed to this report.

Protesters gathered outside a Chicago area hotel Sunday as an Islamic extremist group reportedly linked to Al Qaeda held its first official conference on U.S. soil in an attempt to step up Western recruitment efforts.

Members of Hizb ut-Tahrir — a global Sunni network with reported ties to confessed 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Al Qaeda in Iraq's onetime leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi — met Sunday inside a Hilton hotel to host a conference, "The Fall of Capitalism and the Rise of Islam."

Hizb ut-Tahrir insists that it does not engage in terrorism, and it is not recognized by the State Department as a known terror group.

But some terrorism experts say it may be even more dangerous than many groups that are on the terror list.

"Hizb ut-Tahrir is one of the oldest, largest indoctrinating organizations for the ideology known as jihadism," Walid Phares, director of the Future of Terrorism Project at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told FOXNews.com.

Phares said that Hizb ut-Tahrir, rather than training members to carry out terrorist acts like Al Qaeda, focuses instead on indoctrinating youths between ages of 9 and 18 to absorb the ideology that calls for the formation of an empire — or "khilafah" — that will rule according to Islamic law and condones any means to achieve it, including militant jihad.

Hizb ut-Tahrir often says that its indoctrination "prepares the infantry" that groups like Al Qaeda take into battle, Phares said.

"It's like a middle school that prepares them to be recruited by the high school, which is Al Qaeda," he said. "One would compare them to Hitler youth. ... It's an extremely dangerous organization."

Phares said Hizb ut-Tahrir has strongholds in Western countries, including Britain, France and Spain, and clearly is looking to strengthen its base in the U.S.

"The aim of this conference is to recruit within the Muslim community in America," he said. "The Middle East governments go after them, but in the U.S. they are protected, so having a base here is going to help their cells around the world."

On Sunday, more than 100 group members gathered inside the Oak Lawn Hilton hotel just outside Chicago, blasting capitalism and calling for a rise of Islam.

"Free market, organization, capitalization — all has failed and brought disaster to America," said one of the group's speakers.

Representatives of Hizb ut-Tahrir declined to comment when contacted by FOXNews.com.

Oren Segal, director of Islamic Affairs for the Anti-Defamation League, said the conference is cause for concern.

"While they're not, for the most part, engaging in violent activities, and they publicly say that they're against violence, there have been examples around the world where people who have spun off of this group have engaged in violent activity," Segal told FOXNews.com. "That's why they're banned in several Arab and Central Asian countries, as well as Germany and Russia."

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is one of the group's most famous alumni, New Statesman journalist Shiv Malik reported, citing intelligence sources. In addition to plotting the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, he also is implicated in the World Trade Center bombing of 1993, the Bali nightclub bombings and the murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl.

Malik's report, the public policy institute the Nixon Center and the counter-extremism think tank the Quilliam Foundation agree that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who was the leader of Al Qaeda in Iraq until he was killed in June 2006, also was once a member of Hizb ut-Tahrir.

They say other former members include Asif Muhammad Hanif, a British man who blew himself up outside a bar in Tel Aviv, killing four people (including himself) and wounding more than 50; and Omar Bakri Mohammed, a radical cleric currently banned from Britain who praised the 9/11 attacks, raised funds for Hezbollah and Hamas and called for attacks on the Dublin airport because U.S. troops transfered there on their way to Iraq.

Segal said Hizb ut-Tahrir is becoming more active online in the U.S. — particularly on social networking sites like Facebook and MySpace — and now it may be able to add a significant number of Americans to its ranks.

But one place the group will likely not be recruiting is a local Islamic school that backed out of hosting the conference.

The non-profit Aqsa school in Bridgeview said Hizb ut-Tahrir had deceptively portrayed the conference as a bazaar-type event where traditional food and clothing would be sold.

"They misrepresented themselves and the event. We don't want to be in the middle of something like that," the school's business manager Rana Jaber, told CBS News.

The conference's new venue doesn't seem to mind.

Hilton Oak Lawn General Manager Rick Harmon said Hizb ut-Tahrir used its own name when it reserved the room for the conference, but the hotel was not aware of the content of the event, which includes lectures entitled "Capitalism is Doomed to Fail," "The Global Rise of Islam," and the "Role of Muslims in America," until after the contract was signed.

Still, Harmon said the hotel is open to all kinds of meetings, that don't necessarily reflect its position or beliefs.

"We're United States citizens and an American business — if it's legal, we're able to host it, as long as it's nothing that disrupts our other guests' privacy and security," Harmon told FOXNews.com.

According to the Khilafah Conference 2009 Web site, the group aims to do neither.

"Hizb-ut-Tahrir is convinced that change must start in the minds of people, and therefore does not accept for people, or societies, to be forced to change by means of violence and terror," it reads.

The site, which includes a promotional YouTube video, says the group "does not work in the West to change the system of government, but works to project a positive image of Islam to Western society."

But former member Ishtiaq Hussain said Hizb ut-Tahrir is repackaging itself as a moderate organization as a tactic, while in reality it is "extremist."

"They don't recognize countries like Israel, for example; they don’t believe Israel should exist," Hussain, now a trainer for the Quilliam Foundation, told FOXNews.com. "Some of their leaders have denied the Holocaust, and they believe homosexuals should be thrown off the highest building. ... It's actually a very dangerous group."

Hizb ut-Tahrir itself has also published writings that seem to contradict its tenet of non-violence.

In his book, "How the Khilafah Was Destroyed," Sheikh Abdul Qadeem Zalloom, the former global leader of Hizb ut-Tahrir, says anyone who rules by a non-Islamic system should "either retract or be killed ... even if this led to several years of fighting and even if it led to the killing of millions of Muslims and to the martyrdom of millions of believers."

Hizb ut-Tahrir's official ruling on the permissibility of hijacking planes says, "If the plane belongs to a country at war with Muslims, like Israel, it is allowed to hijack it, for there is no sanctity for Israel nor for the Jews in it."

And one of the organization's more recent leaflets, published in March, calls for the declaration of "a state of war against America."

But, despite these threats and calls to action, Hizb ut-Tahrir remains off the State Department's terror watch list, and it is free to host the Khilafah Conference and any other event like it.

"In other parts of the world where they're really very active, they've drawn tens of thousands of people to some of their events," Segal said.

"It'll be interesting to see to what degree they'll be welcomed here."

FOXNews.com's Diane Macedo and FOX News' Marla Cichowski contributed to this report.


Saturday, July 18, 2009

Israeli warships rehearse for Iran attack in Red Sea


Source:
Date:
By Our Foreign Staff
Published: 2:20PM BST 16 Jul 2009

Israeli warships have deployed to the Red Sea for what has been described as a rehearsal for a possible attack on Iran.

Israeli and Egyptian officials said two ships had sailed through the Suez Canal into the Red Sea.

Media reports in Israel said the two Saar-class missile ships had been sent as a "message" to the Tehran government, which has repeatedly issued threats against Israel and is developing nuclear technology believed by the West to be intended for atomic weapons programme.

While Iran denies this, saying its enrichment of uranium is for civlian purposes only, so that it can generate electricity.

Israel has also deployed a submarine using the Suez Canal, but it has since returned to the Mediterranean.

Defence experts in Israel said this week that the naval activity had been publicised with the intent of sending a message to Iran.

The Israeli government has reserved the right to carry out a first strike on Iran's nuclear facilities if the country continues to defy the international community and spreads instability in the Middle East.

Israel also accuses Iran of sponsoring the Hizbollah movement in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza.



New Iraq Restricting U.S. Forces Sharply

Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/17/AR2009071703634_pf.html
Date: Saturday, July 18, 2009
By Ernesto LondoƱo and Karen DeYoung
Washington Post Foreign Service
Saturday, July 18, 2009

The Washington Post
American Officials See Link Between Limits, Spate of Attacks


BAGHDAD, July 17 -- The Iraqi government has moved to sharply restrict the movement and activities of U.S. forces in a new reading of a six-month-old U.S.-Iraqi security agreement that has startled American commanders and raised concerns about the safety of their troops.

In a curt missive issued by the Baghdad Operations Command on July 2 -- the day after Iraqis celebrated the withdrawal of U.S. troops to bases outside city centers -- Iraq's top commanders told their U.S. counterparts to "stop all joint patrols" in Baghdad. It said U.S. resupply convoys could travel only at night and ordered the Americans to "notify us immediately of any violations of the agreement."
The strict application of the agreement coincides with what U.S. military officials in Washington say has been an escalation of attacks against their forces by Iranian-backed Shiite extremist groups, to which they have been unable to fully respond.

If extremists realize "some of the limitations that we have, that's a vulnerability they could use against us," a senior U.S. military intelligence official said. "The fact is that some of these are very politically sensitive targets" thought to be close to the Shiite-dominated Iraqi government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

The new guidelines are a reflection of rising tensions between the two governments. Iraqi leaders increasingly see the agreement as an opportunity to show their citizens that they are now unequivocally in charge and that their dependence on the U.S. military is minimal and waning.

The June 30 deadline for moving U.S. troops out of Iraqi towns and cities was the first of three milestones under the agreement. The U.S. military is to decrease its troop levels from 130,000 to 50,000 by August of next year.

The Americans have been taken aback by the new restrictions on their activities. The Iraqi order runs "contrary to the spirit and practice of our last several months of operations," Maj. Gen. Daniel P. Bolger, commander of the Baghdad division, wrote in an e-mail obtained by The Washington Post.

"Our [Iraqi] partners burn our fuel, drive roads cleared by our Engineers, live in bases built with our money, operate vehicles fixed with our parts, eat food paid for by our contracts, watch our [surveillance] video feeds, serve citizens with our [funds], and benefit from our air cover," Bolger noted in the e-mail.


Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Soldier balks at deploying; says Obama isn’t president


Source: http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/news/story/776335.html
Date: Tuesday, Jul. 14, 2009
Ledger Enquirer
By Lily Gordon

Says he shouldn’t have to go to Afghanistan because Obama is not a U.S. citizen

U.S. Army Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook, set to deploy to Afghanistan, says he shouldn’t have to go.
His reason?
Barack Obama was never eligible to be president because he wasn’t born in the United States.
Cook’s lawyer, Orly Taitz, who has also challenged the legitimacy of Obama’s presidency in other courts, filed a request last week in federal court seeking a temporary restraining order and status as a conscientious objector for his client.

In the 20-page document — filed July 8 with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia — the California-based Taitz asks the court to consider granting his client’s request based upon Cook’s belief that Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States and is therefore ineligible to serve as commander-in-chief of the U.S. Armed Forces.

Cook further states he “would be acting in violation of international law by engaging in military actions outside the United States under this President’s command. ... simultaneously subjecting himself to possible prosecution as a war criminal by the faithful execution of these duties.”

Cook, a reservist, received the orders mobilizing him to active duty on June 9.

According to this document, which accompanies Cook’s July 8 application for a temporary restraining order, he has been ordered to report to MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, Fla., on Wednesday. From there, the Florida resident would go to Fort Benning before deploying overseas.

Documents show Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961, two years after it became a state.

A hearing to discuss Cook’s requests will take place in federal court here Thursday at 9:30 a.m.

Get Stoked google docs: my google search this morning evidences more than a 193,000 sites answer to this soldier's name. This is what Mark Levin calls the law of unintended consequences.

Obama: Humanist ~ Utopian Commander in Chief

http://docs.google.com/fileview?id=F.c08ced83-30b0-47e0-8506-abd86f55322a

Napalitano Attacking U.S. Extremists [x G.I.s etc] Source pdf from feds

http://docs.google.com/fileview?id=F.e0605445-d244-4869-a751-206b5ef4c783&hl=en

Evil Junta Attacking the Bush Admin

http://docs.google.com/fileview?id=F.e1580b3e-4e22-4b42-a281-0b65f7e4dc6e&hl=en

Are We Holding Our Current Leaders Accountable to Their Oath?

http://docs.google.com/fileview?id=F.944bf9ab-c480-4fb5-a02a-8e4b980b80a9&hl=en

18 Page Third Jihad Source Document: North American Strategy

http://docs.google.com/fileview?id=F.edaae264-8e4e-4b20-88e1-f3878f11c995&hl=en

Law of Unintended Circumstances

http://docs.google.com/fileview?id=F.4e1e6bac-2f8f-4195-b95a-665df4725fb3&hl=en

Obama's Oath: ‘‘I, ___, do solemnly swear

that I will support and defend

the Constitution of the United

States against all enemies, foreign

and domestic; that I will bear true

faith and allegiance to the same;

that I take this obligation freely,

without any mental reservation or

purpose of evasion; and that I will

well and faithfully discharge the

duties of the office on which I am

about to enter. So help me god.’’

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Cyber Attack Hit State Dept 4 Days by North Korea


Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE56709E20090709
Date: Jul 9, 2009


Blue Star Chronicles:
Beth: Multiple US government agencies were hit with a widespread computer attack on the 4th of July. South Korean government agencies experienced similar attacks. It is suspected that these were a North Korean cyber attack. Read about it and see a video on cyber attacks below.


Reuters
Thu Jul 9, 2009 7:20am EDT
By Jack Kim

SEOUL (Reuters) - A fresh wave of cyber attacks that slowed U.S. and South Korean websites this week hit more targets on Thursday, a Web security firm said, while the South's spy agency has said the hacking may be linked to North Korea.

The impact of the attacks, aimed so far at dozens of sites including the White House and the South's presidential office, was seen as negligible, experts said, but served as a reminder that Pyongyang has been planning for cyber warfare.

"The anticipated attack did take place, but considerable counter-measures were taken and it did act as a defense to some degree," an official at the online security firm Ahnlab said.

Some government websites, including the Defense Ministry and the National Intelligence Service, were affected. Access to some U.S. government sites, including the State and Defense Department, from South Korea appeared to be disabled.
The Internet sites of some South Korean banks also experienced a surge in access requests but a bank official said programs were run to disperse traffic and bring service back up within an hour.

If the North was responsible, it would mark an escalation in tension already high from Pyongyang's nuclear test in May, a barrage of ballistic missiles in July and repeated taunts of long-time foes Seoul and Washington in its official media.

But some analysts raised doubts about the North's involvement, saying it may be the work of industrial spies or pranksters.
One online expert was quoted as telling a South Korean daily that tracking of the spread of the malicious software by showed it had originated from an IP address based in United States.

The attacks will likely be regarded by the North's leadership as a victory for Kim Jong-il -- even if Pyongayng was not behind them -- because they hurt the country's traditional foes, adding a new dimension to the threat level posed by the reclusive state.
The attacks saturated target websites with access requests generated by malicious software planted on personal computers. This has overwhelmed some targeted sites and slowed server response to legitimate traffic.

PYONGYANG PLANS FOR CYBER WARFARE

The attacks did not lead to a breach of sensitive government material or damage online infrastructure in South Korea, the world's most wired country, government officials said.

But the National Intelligence Service said in a statement it was stepping up alert to monitor potential attack against the network of energy and communications facilities.
South Korean media quoted parliament members as saying after an intelligence briefing on Wednesday that the spy agency believed "North Korea or pro-North elements" were behind the attacks.

The defense ministry is allocating 26 billion won ($20.33 million) to beef up security for its computer system, according to a budget request it released on Thursday.

Wiki Cyberwarfare: Known Past Attacks
On March 28, 2009, a cyber spy network using servers mainly based in China has tapped into classified documents from government and private organizations in 103 countries, including the computers of Tibetan exiles,[18][19] but China denies the claim.

The United States had come under attack from computers and computer networks situated in China and Russia. See Titan Rain and Moonlight Maze.

On May 17, 2007 Estonia came under cyber attack. The Estonian parliament, ministries, banks, and media were targeted.

On 14 December 2007 the website of the Kyrgyz Central Election Commission was defaced during its election. The message left on the website read "This site has been hacked by Dream of Estonian organization". During the election campaigns and riots preceding the election, there were cases of Denial-of-service attacks against the Kyrgyz ISPs.

Georgian and Azerbaijani sites were attacked by hackers during the 2008 South Ossetia War.